What to send before estimating a custom website or replatform
Author: WebGoodPeople, WGP team
If you need a realistic estimate for a custom website, replatform, or integration project, do not start with “how much does a website cost?”. Start with a short brief. Better inputs mean fewer buffers, assumptions, and hidden scope disputes.
For WGP this matters most in projects with Bitrix, Laravel, Next.js, Elasticsearch, catalogs, account areas, and external APIs. Cost is driven less by the number of screens and more by data flows, roles, integrations, release risks, and acceptance criteria.
What to send before estimation
- Project goal. What should change for the business: speed, leads, SEO, new sections, less manual work, readiness for growth.
- Current stack. CMS, backend, frontend, hosting, key integrations, and who maintains the system today.
- Critical flows. Catalog, search, checkout, forms, account area, roles, import/export, CRM/ERP/1C, payments, notifications.
- What must not break. SEO URLs, filters, orders, stock, analytics, peak sales periods, internal team workflows.
- Data and access. Where the catalog lives, whether APIs exist, import formats, and who owns content and business rules.
- Timing constraints. Deadlines, seasonality, campaigns, release windows, staging requirements.
- Acceptance criteria. How everyone will know the work is ready: flows, metrics, checklists, production checks.
- Preferred first step. Audit, pilot, test slice, or a backlog for a larger project.
How we use the brief
First we separate the base scope from optional/client-specific work. Then we mark uncertainty: integrations, data, roles, migration, non-standard search, and downtime constraints. After that we suggest the shortest safe next step: audit, pilot, or a small work slice.
We promise fixed pricing only when the product boundaries are already known, such as packaged Frontbox formats. For custom development, the honest answer depends on scope, integrations, data, workflows, and acceptance criteria.
What the client gets
Not a magic website price, but a clear next step: what we check, what we build first, where the risks are, what can wait, how staging/production acceptance works, and how the team sees progress through Git Flow, checks, and documentation.
Send a brief to WGP or review our delivery process.
Read next
Articles on adjacent topics — from real projects.
Review AI product copy before updating your catalog
An editorial review process for AI product drafts, covering source material, unsupported claims, missing limitations, useful content, and checks after publication.
Blog · October 7, 2026Choose and define your first automation task
A practical framework for a first automation project, using an inquiry-to-CRM workflow to explain scope, rules, test scenarios, and ownership.
Blog · October 3, 2026Review product page content with a manual AI check
A practical way to review product copy using a manual AI exercise. Learn how to set boundaries, check evidence, record gaps, and avoid drawing conclusions about search or sales.
Newsletter
Headless migrations & AI pilots, unpacked
Every 2 weeks — real cases, numbers and architecture decisions. No marketing noise.