LCP from 9 s to 1.9 s — Bitrix untouched
- 1.9 s
- LCP
- < 100 ms
- Search
- 6 wks
- Launch
Comparison
We break it down across concrete criteria: speed, cost, risk, timelines. We will figure out your case. No pressure to switch.
Frontbox · core
SSR · ISR · edge cache · facets · synonyms · auth
When to choose headless
Standard Bitrix LCP — 6–14 s. On headless (Next.js + edge cache) — 1.7–2.2 s.
5× faster
Built-in Bitrix search — from 2 s. Elasticsearch with facets — under 100 ms at 100k+ SKU.
< 100 ms at 100k SKU
Core Web Vitals red? Headless moves them to green via SSR and edge cache.
Core Web Vitals into the green
Need a new design without rewriting the backend? Frontbox changes only the frontend — Bitrix and 1C stay.
no backend replacement
Comparison
Relevant for stores with a catalog of 500+ SKU and traffic of 1,000+ unique visitors per day.
Benchmarks
How it works
We do not push headless. We analyse your site and give you a straight answer — worth switching or not.
We measure LCP, TTFB, Core Web Vitals. We review catalog architecture, search, and 1C integrations.
We calculate what a migration would deliver in your specific conditions: traffic, catalog, budget, timelines.
We are direct: worth switching or not. If yes — we give you the plan. If no — we explain why.
Live projects
Two Bitrix-backed online stores. Headless frontend added. Backend untouched.
Two paths to headless
Headless is not a single scenario. The right choice depends on budget, timeline and how much control over the stack you need.
Path 1 · Frontbox
The fastest and safest option. Backend and 1C stay untouched. Frontbox connects via API — the frontend changes, business logic does not.
Subscription from ~$380/mo or license ~$1,000/mo × 18 mo
Path 2 · Full migration
When the Bitrix backend is leaving entirely, or you are building a new project. Full architectural freedom — but longer and more expensive.
Cost depends on scope and requirements
| Parameter | Frontbox (on Bitrix) | Full migration |
|---|---|---|
| Launch timeline | 2–6 weeks | 3–6 months |
| Backend replacement | Not required | Yes — full overhaul |
| Cost | from ~$380/mo | On request |
| Risk | Instant rollback | Higher — full stack replacement |
| Best for | Have Bitrix, need speed now | New project or leaving Bitrix |
We will help you pick the right path in a free 30-minute consultation.
Honest about limitations
Headless solves specific problems. If those problems do not exist, it is unnecessary expense. Four situations where we will say "not worth it".
With a small assortment, Bitrix monolith speed is sufficient. The investment will not pay off.
If there is no Bitrix backend — it is simpler to build on Next.js directly, without Frontbox as a middleware layer.
Headless requires resources to maintain. Below this threshold, look at other ways to speed things up.
Replacing the entire platform? Frontbox as an intermediate step is redundant. We design the new stack directly.
FAQ
In a monolithic Bitrix setup, the frontend and backend are in one system — Bitrix renders the templates itself. In a headless architecture, the frontend is separate (Next.js) and pulls data from Bitrix via API. The backend does not know what the site looks like. This delivers speed (SSR + edge cache), design flexibility and independence from CMS updates.
No. With the Frontbox approach, Bitrix remains the source of truth. The frontend reads from Bitrix via API in real time. Product data, orders, and customer records stay exactly where they are.
It makes practical sense starting from a catalog of 500+ SKU or traffic of 1,000+ unique visitors per day. At lower volumes the speed difference exists, but the cost of maintaining a headless stack outweighs the gain. If your case does not fit — we will say so honestly.
It does not. Frontbox operates on top of Bitrix — the 1C integration stays untouched. Orders, stock levels, and prices synchronise through the same Bitrix that was working before.
It depends on the objective. Frontbox is faster (2–6 weeks), cheaper to start (from ~$380/mo), and rollback is instant. A full migration makes sense when Bitrix architecture is blocking business logic, or you are building from scratch. We will work through your specific case on the consultation call.
2 to 6 weeks: scoping and theming (2–3 days), integration and indexing (1 week), testing and traffic switch (2–7 days). In the first week we give you a clear plan with timelines scoped to your catalog.
SEO migrates correctly: we preserve URL structure, meta tags, redirects, sitemap and robots.txt. Core Web Vitals typically improve immediately thanks to SSR and edge caching. Full index transition takes 2–4 weeks.
Three paths: Bitrix cache tuning (free, yields 20–30% improvement), CDN on top of Bitrix (cheaper, but does not fix TTFB), headless frontend (5× LCP difference, resolves it completely). We run an audit and tell you which path will deliver results in your case.
Free 30-minute consultation: we analyse your site and tell you straight, when headless is worth it, and when it is not.